Monday, May 17, 2010
Friday, January 19, 2007
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Back on Track. Sort of.
The Flames took advantage of a tired Dallas team to get the victory last night.
To a degree, anyways.
Calgary further improved on a bunch of stuff in yesterday's game: they won the majority of face-offs for a change and their PK was a second away from being flawless. They lead in the hits department and Kipper was the best goalie on the ice.
On the other hand, some of the weaknesses that have been apparent since day one were still quite obviously in attendence: a terrible, terrible powerplay and an easily stuffed break-out. The result of the two was the inabilty to generate more shots than the opposition, another affliction suffered by this club more often than not thus far this season.
I won't rain on the parade any further, however. This win was quite obviously a step in the right direction. The Flames are slowly but surely shoring up their deficiencies while maintaining their strengths. Im not sure that the Calgary break-out will ever improve much (it's been the same the last few years - rim the puck along the boards. Ugh), but one more goal a night out of the PP would do wonders for the Flame's record, no doubt. Consider that Calgary has allowed the 2nd least amount of goals in the league at even strength. If the PK is indeed back on track, Calgary would easily get back into the black in terms of total goal differential if they had any sort of PP worth talking about. And a positive goal differential always = wins.
Positives:
- Tony Amonte. Probably his best game as a Flame. Tireless penalty killer and actually looked dangerous in the offensive zone. All this after I've been ripping into him around here for the last few weeks.
- Roman Hamrlik. He's enjoyed a renaissance since being re-teamed with Phaneuf. Is currently the Flames #1 defenseman.
- Jarome Iginla. Takes draws, kills penalties, sets up teammates on the PP. There's nothing that Jarome currently isn't doing well.
- Andrew Ference. Big fight and a relatively error free evening. Lord I hope he keeps it up.
- Miika Kiprusoff. Although the team played well, Kipper is probably the reason they won the game.
Negatives:
- The PP. 0 for 7 and only 2 shots on goal. Laughable.
- The break-out. I've concluded that the Flames break-out is one of the worst in the league. It's the primary reason the Flames get hemmed in their own end for long sequences. More direct tape to tape passes and something besides rimming the puck to a winger standing still on the half-boards is required.
- Only 17 shots on goal. The Flames actually generated a decent amount of scoring chances, but ended up either making one too many passes or hitting the post most of the time.
- Injury woes. Here we go. With Zyuzin, Friesen and Yelle already on the shelf, messiah-turned-scapegoat Alex Tanguay hurts his shoulder delivering a hit. No word on the extent of the injury yet.
Next up - the mighty (in nature if not by name) Ducks.
To a degree, anyways.
Calgary further improved on a bunch of stuff in yesterday's game: they won the majority of face-offs for a change and their PK was a second away from being flawless. They lead in the hits department and Kipper was the best goalie on the ice.
On the other hand, some of the weaknesses that have been apparent since day one were still quite obviously in attendence: a terrible, terrible powerplay and an easily stuffed break-out. The result of the two was the inabilty to generate more shots than the opposition, another affliction suffered by this club more often than not thus far this season.
I won't rain on the parade any further, however. This win was quite obviously a step in the right direction. The Flames are slowly but surely shoring up their deficiencies while maintaining their strengths. Im not sure that the Calgary break-out will ever improve much (it's been the same the last few years - rim the puck along the boards. Ugh), but one more goal a night out of the PP would do wonders for the Flame's record, no doubt. Consider that Calgary has allowed the 2nd least amount of goals in the league at even strength. If the PK is indeed back on track, Calgary would easily get back into the black in terms of total goal differential if they had any sort of PP worth talking about. And a positive goal differential always = wins.
Positives:
- Tony Amonte. Probably his best game as a Flame. Tireless penalty killer and actually looked dangerous in the offensive zone. All this after I've been ripping into him around here for the last few weeks.
- Roman Hamrlik. He's enjoyed a renaissance since being re-teamed with Phaneuf. Is currently the Flames #1 defenseman.
- Jarome Iginla. Takes draws, kills penalties, sets up teammates on the PP. There's nothing that Jarome currently isn't doing well.
- Andrew Ference. Big fight and a relatively error free evening. Lord I hope he keeps it up.
- Miika Kiprusoff. Although the team played well, Kipper is probably the reason they won the game.
Negatives:
- The PP. 0 for 7 and only 2 shots on goal. Laughable.
- The break-out. I've concluded that the Flames break-out is one of the worst in the league. It's the primary reason the Flames get hemmed in their own end for long sequences. More direct tape to tape passes and something besides rimming the puck to a winger standing still on the half-boards is required.
- Only 17 shots on goal. The Flames actually generated a decent amount of scoring chances, but ended up either making one too many passes or hitting the post most of the time.
- Injury woes. Here we go. With Zyuzin, Friesen and Yelle already on the shelf, messiah-turned-scapegoat Alex Tanguay hurts his shoulder delivering a hit. No word on the extent of the injury yet.
Next up - the mighty (in nature if not by name) Ducks.
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
NWD Breakdown: Calgary Flames
All the pieces appear to be in place for the Flames heading into the season - a solid top 6 defense corps, a vezina winner in net and a potentially revitalized attack with the addition of Alex Tanguay and Jeff Friesen up front. All that's left is to combine the pieces into a cohesive, formidible whole.
The questions facing the Flames this year include:
- Can Jim Playfair adequately lead the team in Sutter's stead?
- Will the Flames actually be able to score at even-strength?
- Can Phaneuf step up and play top 2 minutes with Robyn Regehr?
2005/2006 Stuff:
103 points, 3rd in the West
216 Goals For (27th)
193 Goals Against (1st)
18.2% PP (12th)
84.2% PK (7th)
Top Scorers:
Jarome Iginla (35 Goals, 67 points, 17 PP goals)
Damond Lankgow (34 Assists)
Forwards:
Subtractions: Shean Donovan, Mike Leclerc, Craig MacDonald
Additions: Jeff Friesen, Alex Tanguay
Calgary has a very similar crop of forwards compared to last year. Friesen draws into Donovan's speedy-third-line-winger spot, while Tanguay fills a top line position that has been vacant for a long, long time. Leclerc and MadDonald were lost via free agency and won't be missed.
The overriding goal for the Flames this year is to...well...score (at even-strength). Offense was Calgary's lone glaring weakness last season and it cost them the series against Anaheim. In order to become a genuine contender and to defend their NW division crown, the Flames should be shooting for middle-of-the pack output; say 250 goals. That's a 34 goal increase from 05/06.
It seems like an obtainable objective on the face of it. The addition of Alex Tanguay should mean an injection of at least 25 more tallies alone. A full year of Kristian Huselius on the 2nd line may also add some red-light replays - Juice scored at a 60 point pace in Flames colors last season (despite Calgary's year long scoring woes). If Jeff Friesen can score more than Shean Donovan (highly doable) and if Tanguay actually rejuvenates Jarome Iginla, the Flames shouldn't have any more significant scoring issues. If want more good news, consider that Tanguay was Colorado's best point producer at even-strength last year...
Course, things that look good on paper don't always translate on the ice. Tanguay has played his whole career sheltered by the shadows of superstars. No longer behind the likes of Sakic, Forsberg and Hejduk, he'll have to step up and prove that he can be a "go-to" guy. In addition, "Flames Hockey" under the Sutter regime has come to mean rough play, stingy defense and a complete lack of risk taking and offensive creativity. It reamins to be seen if Playfair can appropriately harnass and unleash the likes of Iginla and Tanguay without sacrificing the "Flames identity".
The Skinny:
Calgary was terrible at scoring 5on5 last year. Iginla had an off year and most of the support players (Donovan, Yelle, Nilson, Amonte, Lombardi, Simon) were abysmal offensively. A turn-around is not out of the question if Iginla and Tanguay can click with the odd secondary player rebounding from last season. Should one of the top two stars get injured long-term, however, the Flames may be languishing near the bottom of the league in goals for again. Playfair has to prove he can re-jig the offensive systems around the top two lines while keeping the team mean and defensively responsible.
Defense:
Subtractions: Jordan Leopold, Bryan Marchment, Cale Hulse
Additions: Andrei Zyuzin, Mark Giordano
I am glad to see the back of Marchment and Hulse. Good riddance!
The loss of Jordan Leopold, however, is not insignificant. While Leo had a brutal offensive year (like almost everyone not named "Phaneuf" on the Flames last year) last season he was among the leaders in terms of ice-time for Calgary. He played a lot of tough minutes against other team's top players with Robyn Regehr and was a capable puck-mover at either end of the ice.
According to the preseason, it looks like Dion Phaneuf will be stepping up into the top two pairing with Regehr. As a rookie, Phaneuf lead the Flames in ice-time, although a great deal of it was spent blasting pucks at goalie's head on the powerplay. It will be up to the super-rookie now sophomore to prove he can take on the leagues best night in and night out. Being paired with Regehr certainly won't hurt in that regard.
Leo's loss will be further off-set by the acquisition of Andrei Zyuzin. Zyuzin was a 19 minute-man with the Wild last season. While he doesn't strike me as competent a defender as Leopold, he should be able to eat up between 18-20 minutes per night on the second pairing with Hamrlik well enough. His 7 goals from the blueline will also be a welcome addition above Leopold's 2.
The real challenge here may simply be staying healthy. Thanks to injuries to Warrener, Hamrlik, Regehr and Leopold the Flames only played with a full compliment of their top 6 defensemen 30 or so games last season. Of course, should anyone go down, Calgary has two-time preseason stand-out Mark Giordano waiting in the wings. Giordano lead the Omaha Knights in points last season (despite playing some games in the pros) and was the only Flame to play in all 7 exhibition tilts this September. He won't be put anywhere near top 4 type situations, but he should prove to be an adequate 6th spot fill-in...
The Skinny:
The blueline is unquestionably Calgary's strength. From top to bottom, the Flames have the best defender depth in the division - keep in mind Calgary managed to allow the fewest goals against in the league last season despite having so many d-man injuries.
Goaltending:
Miikka Kiprusoff is roundly considered one of the two best goalies in the NHL. He was top 5 in basically every significant goaltending statistical category last season and is the most recent recipient of the Vezina trophy. The only issues facing Kipper are:
- Can he better in the shoot-out? Calgary lost a lot of points to shoot-outs last year. Partially because Kipper was among the worst in the league in S/O save percentage.
- Can he avoid a slow start? Imagine the stats Kiprusoff WOULD have generated in 05/06 had he not been Raycroft-esque in his first 10 games. There were signs in September he might be in for a repeat of last October's suckage when he was lit up during his first two preseason contests. Hopefully, that can be avoided this time around though.
Calgary will also need some semi-capable work out of their back-up, Jamie McLennan, this season. Both Sauve and Boucher proved to be terrible in their limited roles last year, meaning they were played as little as possible. If McLennan can be a 2.50 GAA /.900 SP in 10 or 15 starts he could take some of the pressure off of Kiprusoff. His career stats suggest it's possible.
The Skinny: In combination with their defense corps., the Flames have little to worry about on the back-end. I expect Kipper to once again challenge for the Vezina by year end. Of course, Injury is a HUGE concern given that McLennan would not be able to take the reigns in Kipper's absence...
Conclusion:
Calgary won the division last year and they've only gotten better while most of their division rivals have either taken lateral steps (Edmonton) or gotten worse (Vancouver, Colorado). If the Flames can figure out how to score with regularity there's no reason to think they won't be one of the best teams in the conference.
Prediction:
1st in the Northwest Division and 3rd in the Western Conference.
The questions facing the Flames this year include:
- Can Jim Playfair adequately lead the team in Sutter's stead?
- Will the Flames actually be able to score at even-strength?
- Can Phaneuf step up and play top 2 minutes with Robyn Regehr?
2005/2006 Stuff:
103 points, 3rd in the West
216 Goals For (27th)
193 Goals Against (1st)
18.2% PP (12th)
84.2% PK (7th)
Top Scorers:
Jarome Iginla (35 Goals, 67 points, 17 PP goals)
Damond Lankgow (34 Assists)
Forwards:
Subtractions: Shean Donovan, Mike Leclerc, Craig MacDonald
Additions: Jeff Friesen, Alex Tanguay
Calgary has a very similar crop of forwards compared to last year. Friesen draws into Donovan's speedy-third-line-winger spot, while Tanguay fills a top line position that has been vacant for a long, long time. Leclerc and MadDonald were lost via free agency and won't be missed.
The overriding goal for the Flames this year is to...well...score (at even-strength). Offense was Calgary's lone glaring weakness last season and it cost them the series against Anaheim. In order to become a genuine contender and to defend their NW division crown, the Flames should be shooting for middle-of-the pack output; say 250 goals. That's a 34 goal increase from 05/06.
It seems like an obtainable objective on the face of it. The addition of Alex Tanguay should mean an injection of at least 25 more tallies alone. A full year of Kristian Huselius on the 2nd line may also add some red-light replays - Juice scored at a 60 point pace in Flames colors last season (despite Calgary's year long scoring woes). If Jeff Friesen can score more than Shean Donovan (highly doable) and if Tanguay actually rejuvenates Jarome Iginla, the Flames shouldn't have any more significant scoring issues. If want more good news, consider that Tanguay was Colorado's best point producer at even-strength last year...
Course, things that look good on paper don't always translate on the ice. Tanguay has played his whole career sheltered by the shadows of superstars. No longer behind the likes of Sakic, Forsberg and Hejduk, he'll have to step up and prove that he can be a "go-to" guy. In addition, "Flames Hockey" under the Sutter regime has come to mean rough play, stingy defense and a complete lack of risk taking and offensive creativity. It reamins to be seen if Playfair can appropriately harnass and unleash the likes of Iginla and Tanguay without sacrificing the "Flames identity".
The Skinny:
Calgary was terrible at scoring 5on5 last year. Iginla had an off year and most of the support players (Donovan, Yelle, Nilson, Amonte, Lombardi, Simon) were abysmal offensively. A turn-around is not out of the question if Iginla and Tanguay can click with the odd secondary player rebounding from last season. Should one of the top two stars get injured long-term, however, the Flames may be languishing near the bottom of the league in goals for again. Playfair has to prove he can re-jig the offensive systems around the top two lines while keeping the team mean and defensively responsible.
Defense:
Subtractions: Jordan Leopold, Bryan Marchment, Cale Hulse
Additions: Andrei Zyuzin, Mark Giordano
I am glad to see the back of Marchment and Hulse. Good riddance!
The loss of Jordan Leopold, however, is not insignificant. While Leo had a brutal offensive year (like almost everyone not named "Phaneuf" on the Flames last year) last season he was among the leaders in terms of ice-time for Calgary. He played a lot of tough minutes against other team's top players with Robyn Regehr and was a capable puck-mover at either end of the ice.
According to the preseason, it looks like Dion Phaneuf will be stepping up into the top two pairing with Regehr. As a rookie, Phaneuf lead the Flames in ice-time, although a great deal of it was spent blasting pucks at goalie's head on the powerplay. It will be up to the super-rookie now sophomore to prove he can take on the leagues best night in and night out. Being paired with Regehr certainly won't hurt in that regard.
Leo's loss will be further off-set by the acquisition of Andrei Zyuzin. Zyuzin was a 19 minute-man with the Wild last season. While he doesn't strike me as competent a defender as Leopold, he should be able to eat up between 18-20 minutes per night on the second pairing with Hamrlik well enough. His 7 goals from the blueline will also be a welcome addition above Leopold's 2.
The real challenge here may simply be staying healthy. Thanks to injuries to Warrener, Hamrlik, Regehr and Leopold the Flames only played with a full compliment of their top 6 defensemen 30 or so games last season. Of course, should anyone go down, Calgary has two-time preseason stand-out Mark Giordano waiting in the wings. Giordano lead the Omaha Knights in points last season (despite playing some games in the pros) and was the only Flame to play in all 7 exhibition tilts this September. He won't be put anywhere near top 4 type situations, but he should prove to be an adequate 6th spot fill-in...
The Skinny:
The blueline is unquestionably Calgary's strength. From top to bottom, the Flames have the best defender depth in the division - keep in mind Calgary managed to allow the fewest goals against in the league last season despite having so many d-man injuries.
Goaltending:
Miikka Kiprusoff is roundly considered one of the two best goalies in the NHL. He was top 5 in basically every significant goaltending statistical category last season and is the most recent recipient of the Vezina trophy. The only issues facing Kipper are:
- Can he better in the shoot-out? Calgary lost a lot of points to shoot-outs last year. Partially because Kipper was among the worst in the league in S/O save percentage.
- Can he avoid a slow start? Imagine the stats Kiprusoff WOULD have generated in 05/06 had he not been Raycroft-esque in his first 10 games. There were signs in September he might be in for a repeat of last October's suckage when he was lit up during his first two preseason contests. Hopefully, that can be avoided this time around though.
Calgary will also need some semi-capable work out of their back-up, Jamie McLennan, this season. Both Sauve and Boucher proved to be terrible in their limited roles last year, meaning they were played as little as possible. If McLennan can be a 2.50 GAA /.900 SP in 10 or 15 starts he could take some of the pressure off of Kiprusoff. His career stats suggest it's possible.
The Skinny: In combination with their defense corps., the Flames have little to worry about on the back-end. I expect Kipper to once again challenge for the Vezina by year end. Of course, Injury is a HUGE concern given that McLennan would not be able to take the reigns in Kipper's absence...
Conclusion:
Calgary won the division last year and they've only gotten better while most of their division rivals have either taken lateral steps (Edmonton) or gotten worse (Vancouver, Colorado). If the Flames can figure out how to score with regularity there's no reason to think they won't be one of the best teams in the conference.
Prediction:
1st in the Northwest Division and 3rd in the Western Conference.
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
NW Division Breakdown: Edmonton Oilers
With the loss of Chris Pronger and Jaroslav Spacek on the back-end, it looks like it's going to be a year of all-out barn-burner hockey up in the chuck this season. line after line of swift, offensively adept forwards will have to make up for the obvious deficiencies on the blueline (and, potentially, beyond). The Oil are a difficult puzzle to crack in terms of predictions this off-season: if things go right, they could challenge for the division lead. If not, they could be duking it out with the other cellar-dwellars.
The main questions facing this squad include:
- Can the rag-tag Oiler blueline hold up over the season?
- Can Roloson be the #1 guy at 37 years old?
- Can Edmonton's young forwards continue to prove they are legitimate offensive players?
2005/2006 Stuff:
95 points, 8th in the West
249 Goals For (15th)
242 Goals Against (12th)
18.1% PP (12th)
84.1% PK (8th)
Top Scorers:
Ales Hemsky (77 points)
Ryan Smyth (36 goals, 19 PP goals)
Ales Hemsky (58 assists)
Forwards:
Subtractions: Radek Dvorak, Georges Laraque, Rem Murray, Todd Harvey, Mike Peca
Additions: Joffrey Lupul, Petr Sykora, Alexei Mikhnov, MA Pouliot
The Oilers were a middle of the pack scoring team last year and have added a couple of 25-30 goal guys in the off-season. Lupul, who was a key piece in the Pronger deal, is a budding sniper who should bring another 25 goals minimum to the mix. Expect to see him garner top line minutes. Sykora hasn't been the same since leaving the swamp, but he should still be good for at least another 20 goal season. Especially surrounded by so much offensive potential.
The players the Oil lost to free agency were all pretty much checking line fodder. Murray and Harvey are still looking for jobs I believe while Laraque was exiled to the Desert of misfit players. Peca left to retire in Toronto and Dvorak will be plumbing the depths with the Blues this season. Of the departures, Dvorak is probably the only one worth anything. While he'll probably never come close to 30 goals again, he seemed to have utility as a speedy 3rd line checker. He scored 28 points last year, 5 more than Peca, and was a great deal cheaper. As for Michael, he managed just 23 points in 71 games for his 4 million bucks and was a -4. Play-off heroics aside, Im sure most Edmonton fans are pleased to see the back of him.
Perhaps one minor area of concern for the Oilers forwards ranks is the fact that 6 of their forwards enjoyed career seasons last year. Hemsky jumped from 34 points in 03/04 to 77 in 05/06. Horcoff had a similar quantum leap, moving from 33 points in 02/03 and 40 points in 03/04 to 70 points last season. Jarett Stoll, tabbed by many to be a gritty, 2-way centerman, increased his 21 points in 68 games from 2 years ago to an impressive 68 points in his first full season. Ryan Smyth, the bedgraggled, mullet-bearing King of crease-crashing managed 36 markers last year, the second highest of his career behind his 96/97 total of 39. Smyth has only ever cracked the 30 goal plateau once before, back in 00/01. Finally, Fernando Pisani and Raffie Torres also experienced mild increases in their point totals, both garnering 7 more points relative to his best year.
The dark-side-of-the-moon for the Oil faithful is that it's fairly rare to see players best their career stats immediately after setting them. If the above guys can maintain or improve on their offensive stats from last season, Edmonton will be fine. It's rather probable, however, that one of (if not all) Hemsky, Horcoff or Stoll will regress slightly this season. Should Edmonton be able to keep the puck out of the net as well or better than they did last season (big IF) and should Lupul and Sykora prove to be effective barriers against the other guys predicted regression, this MAY not be much of an issue. Perhaps...
The Skinny:
The Oil probably won't struggle to score goals but they aren't going to lead the league either. Lots of young talent and depth with 0 high-end game breakers and the possibility of a couple players taking a step-back, numbers-wise, thrown in to complicate things. Virtually immune to injury issues thanks to depth, however.
Defense:
Subtractions: Chris Pronger, Jaroslav Spacek, Igor Ulanov, Cory Cross, Dick Tarnstrom
Additions: Ladislav Smid, Jan Hejda, Daniel Tjarnqvist
There's a big, sucking black hole on the Oiler's blueline left by the departures of Pronger and Spacek...
how big?
Pronger scored 56 points and played over 2,200 minutes last season. The only player to even approach seeing an equivalent amount of ice was...yup...Jaroslav Spacek at about 1,800 minutes (not all of it was with the Oilers, of course). 3rd and 4th on the club were Staios and Bergeron with 1,712 and 1,591 minutes total respectively. All told, Pronger averaged 28 minutes a night and lead the team in multiple categories such as average SH minutes (5:11/game) and PP minutes (6:40/game) played.
Basically, Pronger was the "anchor" that granted Oiler's forwards "license to soar". He played 7 minutes more per contest than any remaining defender and was the leader in practically every situation on the ice. Im fairly certain that Pronger's presence had something to do with the sudden and impressive jumps in several of the young forwards point totals last season and therefore think his departure will be a significant cause of their impeding regression this season.
Of course, Pronger also had something to do with keeping pucks out of the net as well. Lacking "The Orbs of Power" on the back-end will mean a lot more ice-time for the likes of Staios, Smith and Bergeron this season. Of the three, only Bergeron averaged more than 20 minutes in 05/06, and 4.5 minutes of that was on the PP. The question remains whether guys like Smith and Staios can step up and play top 2 minutes competently for an entire season. Especially since new faces Smid and Hejda may have to be sheltered a bit in light of their lack of experience. Tjarnqvist was a 20 minute/night player over 60 games for the Wild last year, meaning he'll have to step into a top 4 roll at the very least. Keep in mind, however, that Tjarnqvist has never played more than 75 games in 4 seasons and has never been a (+) player yet in his career. He'll have to take a pretty sizable step forward if the Oilers want him to take part in the heavy lifting all year.
Smid and Hejda are the unknown commodities here. By all reports, Smid is an excellent prospect and should develop into a decent player. Course, it's unknown whether he will immediately make significant Ballard/Seabrook/Phaneuf type contributions. If not, youngster Greene and newcomer Hejda may be leaned on for an uncomfortable number of minutes each night...
Course, it all gets REALLY ugly should the likes of Staios or Smith get injured for any length of time.
The Skinny:
The Oilers have to pray for career-type seasons out of their top 4 defenders in order to be competent, defense-wise. It will be hugely beneficial if the likes of Smid and Hejda prove to be adequate NHLer's. If not, any kind of long-term infirmary time for Smith or Staios could prove disasterous. Thanks to their cap space and wealth of forwards, a trade for a d-man mid way through the year is not out of the question.
Goaltending:
Dwayne Roloson played 19 games after the trade deadline in Edmonton colors last year, and managed 8 wins and a 2.42 GAA (.905 SP) in that time. The challenge facing the former Flame this season is to duplicate or improve those numbers over the long haul behind a completely Pronger-less (or even a reasonable facsilime-less) defense corps. Over the course of his NHL tenure, Roloson has avergaed just 36 games/season; the 50 contest 02/03 year being the high water mark. He's 37, just signed the most lucrative contract of his career and has never been a starting goalie. Hmmmm...
To be fair, Roloson does have gawdy career bests (1.88 GAA, 0.933 SP), which suggest some measure of skill. It's notable, though, that he typically hovered around rather mediocre numbers until the 02-04 season(s) with the Wild. Overall, really, his career year looks more like an aberration than a sign of impending stardom.
The Skinny:
If Roloson falters in a Belfourian fashion this year it may well sink the Oil. He's a 37 year old career back-up who will either fight valiantly to prove he's a legit NHL starter or will take his new fat contract and fade into the horizon. Injury and stamina are also a concern.
Conclusion:
Edmonton is an utter enigma heading into the season. Should things go right and their forwards prove immune to regression, their unknown defensemen step up and Roloson defy all odds, Edmonton could be top 5 in the conference. On the other hand, the loss of Pronger and lack of high-end talent on the back-end could well create a shooting gallery that may prove to be beyond Roloson's ability or stamina to handle. Lots of IF's to ponder. Somewhere in the middle, and the Oil battle for 8th spot again.
Prediction:
Part of me thinks Edmonton will out-do the likes of Colorado and Dallas and place 7th in the conference. Then again, the Flames fan part of me is screaming 10th.
The main questions facing this squad include:
- Can the rag-tag Oiler blueline hold up over the season?
- Can Roloson be the #1 guy at 37 years old?
- Can Edmonton's young forwards continue to prove they are legitimate offensive players?
2005/2006 Stuff:
95 points, 8th in the West
249 Goals For (15th)
242 Goals Against (12th)
18.1% PP (12th)
84.1% PK (8th)
Top Scorers:
Ales Hemsky (77 points)
Ryan Smyth (36 goals, 19 PP goals)
Ales Hemsky (58 assists)
Forwards:
Subtractions: Radek Dvorak, Georges Laraque, Rem Murray, Todd Harvey, Mike Peca
Additions: Joffrey Lupul, Petr Sykora, Alexei Mikhnov, MA Pouliot
The Oilers were a middle of the pack scoring team last year and have added a couple of 25-30 goal guys in the off-season. Lupul, who was a key piece in the Pronger deal, is a budding sniper who should bring another 25 goals minimum to the mix. Expect to see him garner top line minutes. Sykora hasn't been the same since leaving the swamp, but he should still be good for at least another 20 goal season. Especially surrounded by so much offensive potential.
The players the Oil lost to free agency were all pretty much checking line fodder. Murray and Harvey are still looking for jobs I believe while Laraque was exiled to the Desert of misfit players. Peca left to retire in Toronto and Dvorak will be plumbing the depths with the Blues this season. Of the departures, Dvorak is probably the only one worth anything. While he'll probably never come close to 30 goals again, he seemed to have utility as a speedy 3rd line checker. He scored 28 points last year, 5 more than Peca, and was a great deal cheaper. As for Michael, he managed just 23 points in 71 games for his 4 million bucks and was a -4. Play-off heroics aside, Im sure most Edmonton fans are pleased to see the back of him.
Perhaps one minor area of concern for the Oilers forwards ranks is the fact that 6 of their forwards enjoyed career seasons last year. Hemsky jumped from 34 points in 03/04 to 77 in 05/06. Horcoff had a similar quantum leap, moving from 33 points in 02/03 and 40 points in 03/04 to 70 points last season. Jarett Stoll, tabbed by many to be a gritty, 2-way centerman, increased his 21 points in 68 games from 2 years ago to an impressive 68 points in his first full season. Ryan Smyth, the bedgraggled, mullet-bearing King of crease-crashing managed 36 markers last year, the second highest of his career behind his 96/97 total of 39. Smyth has only ever cracked the 30 goal plateau once before, back in 00/01. Finally, Fernando Pisani and Raffie Torres also experienced mild increases in their point totals, both garnering 7 more points relative to his best year.
The dark-side-of-the-moon for the Oil faithful is that it's fairly rare to see players best their career stats immediately after setting them. If the above guys can maintain or improve on their offensive stats from last season, Edmonton will be fine. It's rather probable, however, that one of (if not all) Hemsky, Horcoff or Stoll will regress slightly this season. Should Edmonton be able to keep the puck out of the net as well or better than they did last season (big IF) and should Lupul and Sykora prove to be effective barriers against the other guys predicted regression, this MAY not be much of an issue. Perhaps...
The Skinny:
The Oil probably won't struggle to score goals but they aren't going to lead the league either. Lots of young talent and depth with 0 high-end game breakers and the possibility of a couple players taking a step-back, numbers-wise, thrown in to complicate things. Virtually immune to injury issues thanks to depth, however.
Defense:
Subtractions: Chris Pronger, Jaroslav Spacek, Igor Ulanov, Cory Cross, Dick Tarnstrom
Additions: Ladislav Smid, Jan Hejda, Daniel Tjarnqvist
There's a big, sucking black hole on the Oiler's blueline left by the departures of Pronger and Spacek...
how big?
Pronger scored 56 points and played over 2,200 minutes last season. The only player to even approach seeing an equivalent amount of ice was...yup...Jaroslav Spacek at about 1,800 minutes (not all of it was with the Oilers, of course). 3rd and 4th on the club were Staios and Bergeron with 1,712 and 1,591 minutes total respectively. All told, Pronger averaged 28 minutes a night and lead the team in multiple categories such as average SH minutes (5:11/game) and PP minutes (6:40/game) played.
Basically, Pronger was the "anchor" that granted Oiler's forwards "license to soar". He played 7 minutes more per contest than any remaining defender and was the leader in practically every situation on the ice. Im fairly certain that Pronger's presence had something to do with the sudden and impressive jumps in several of the young forwards point totals last season and therefore think his departure will be a significant cause of their impeding regression this season.
Of course, Pronger also had something to do with keeping pucks out of the net as well. Lacking "The Orbs of Power" on the back-end will mean a lot more ice-time for the likes of Staios, Smith and Bergeron this season. Of the three, only Bergeron averaged more than 20 minutes in 05/06, and 4.5 minutes of that was on the PP. The question remains whether guys like Smith and Staios can step up and play top 2 minutes competently for an entire season. Especially since new faces Smid and Hejda may have to be sheltered a bit in light of their lack of experience. Tjarnqvist was a 20 minute/night player over 60 games for the Wild last year, meaning he'll have to step into a top 4 roll at the very least. Keep in mind, however, that Tjarnqvist has never played more than 75 games in 4 seasons and has never been a (+) player yet in his career. He'll have to take a pretty sizable step forward if the Oilers want him to take part in the heavy lifting all year.
Smid and Hejda are the unknown commodities here. By all reports, Smid is an excellent prospect and should develop into a decent player. Course, it's unknown whether he will immediately make significant Ballard/Seabrook/Phaneuf type contributions. If not, youngster Greene and newcomer Hejda may be leaned on for an uncomfortable number of minutes each night...
Course, it all gets REALLY ugly should the likes of Staios or Smith get injured for any length of time.
The Skinny:
The Oilers have to pray for career-type seasons out of their top 4 defenders in order to be competent, defense-wise. It will be hugely beneficial if the likes of Smid and Hejda prove to be adequate NHLer's. If not, any kind of long-term infirmary time for Smith or Staios could prove disasterous. Thanks to their cap space and wealth of forwards, a trade for a d-man mid way through the year is not out of the question.
Goaltending:
Dwayne Roloson played 19 games after the trade deadline in Edmonton colors last year, and managed 8 wins and a 2.42 GAA (.905 SP) in that time. The challenge facing the former Flame this season is to duplicate or improve those numbers over the long haul behind a completely Pronger-less (or even a reasonable facsilime-less) defense corps. Over the course of his NHL tenure, Roloson has avergaed just 36 games/season; the 50 contest 02/03 year being the high water mark. He's 37, just signed the most lucrative contract of his career and has never been a starting goalie. Hmmmm...
To be fair, Roloson does have gawdy career bests (1.88 GAA, 0.933 SP), which suggest some measure of skill. It's notable, though, that he typically hovered around rather mediocre numbers until the 02-04 season(s) with the Wild. Overall, really, his career year looks more like an aberration than a sign of impending stardom.
The Skinny:
If Roloson falters in a Belfourian fashion this year it may well sink the Oil. He's a 37 year old career back-up who will either fight valiantly to prove he's a legit NHL starter or will take his new fat contract and fade into the horizon. Injury and stamina are also a concern.
Conclusion:
Edmonton is an utter enigma heading into the season. Should things go right and their forwards prove immune to regression, their unknown defensemen step up and Roloson defy all odds, Edmonton could be top 5 in the conference. On the other hand, the loss of Pronger and lack of high-end talent on the back-end could well create a shooting gallery that may prove to be beyond Roloson's ability or stamina to handle. Lots of IF's to ponder. Somewhere in the middle, and the Oil battle for 8th spot again.
Prediction:
Part of me thinks Edmonton will out-do the likes of Colorado and Dallas and place 7th in the conference. Then again, the Flames fan part of me is screaming 10th.
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
The Hockey Pool Post
It's the most wonderful time of the year - the start of hockey season and, therefore, hockey pools!
This season's Five Hole Fanatics pool was set-up by Chunky Moose and Alex. The rules governing the draft and points were established as follows:
- Live draft format.
- Teams will consist of 10 forwards, 4 defensemen and 1 goalie. Goalies will be drafted seperately from skaters.
- 1 "darkhorse" selection per player. The DH will be submitted anonymously at the conclusion of the draft and cannot be a goalie. Any matching darkhorses are disqualified.
- Point System:
Skaters points -
- Goal: 2 points
- Assist: 1 point
- OT goal: +1 (bonus)
Goalie points -
- Goalie Win: 1 point
- Team Win: 1 point
- Shut-out: +2 points (bonus)
- Assist: 2 points
- Goal: 8 points
- Four trades allowed during the season. Only players on the "free agent" list are open for selection.
This was my first draft with a "darkhorse" choice and I've concluded that I like it. The challenge of choosing a decent player, while at the same time trying to avoid selecting the same guy as someone else, spices things up a little turns the end of the draft into something of a poker match.
(click to enlarge)
The draft took place this weekend. Above are the 12 "GM's" (including all 5 Five Hole Fanatics contributors), their teams and the order in which the players were selected. Altogether, 168 skaters were drafted, plus 12 goalies and 12 darkhorses. Dany Healtey went #1 overall and Pittsburgh d-man Ryan Whitney was the last guy taken at #168. The draft was done in sections and took all bloody weekend. The darkhorse picks were sent in and finalized yesterday.
Points of interest:
- Khabibulin was selected despite his terrible season last year AND the fact that 'tender's accrue points based on wins (both by them and by the team as a whole). Hmmm...does GM Krahn know something I don't?
- Iginla was the top Flame to be selected at #9 although Tanguay wasn't far behind at #18. Phaneuf was the first defensemen to be taken at #30. Altogether, 10 Calgary players were drafted - Iginla, Tanguay, Phaneuf, Lombardi, Huselius, Hamrlik, Regehr, A. Ference, Langkow and Kipper.
- Kiprusoff was snagged first in the goalie draft, of course. Ryan Miller was the surprise second choice, followed by Brodeur. I selected Vokoun with the 8th pick. The fact that Nashville will play the likes of Chicago, St. Louis and Columbus all year forced my hand.
- The average age of the oldest team selected: 34.31 (Thomsen).
- The team with the most Canadians: 12 of 16 (Tyler).
- Players that went undrafted: Modin, Brunette, JP Dumont, PM Bouchard, Bulis.
- On a "You can't make this kind of shit up" note - Alex Hemsky was the first Oiler selected at pick #44(!).
My team and Strategy:
Seeing as goals are worth double that of assists, I made sure to tab goal getters and top powerplay guys in my draft. Although I was stuck in the 8th position, I still managed to grab Kovalchuk as my first selection. My rationale? Kovalchuk's goal totals have been steadily increasing since he broke into the NHL (29, 38, 41 and 52) meaning he's in line for a pretty massive season. It also helps that he's deadly on the PP.
Another strategy I employed this year was "linking" linemates: by grabbing a decent offensive line, goals can often be worth 3 points (goal+assist) rather than just 2 (goal). Thus my Hossa pick - not only is he a first unit PP linemate of my first round selection, he's also a pretty damn consistent point-getter (he hasn't had less than 30 goals in the last 5 seasons). Should be a pretty lethal combination. Some other linked (potential) linemates on my team include Briere, Afinogenov and Kotalik. Basically, I wanted to get a healthy piece what I think will be a deadly Sabre PP.
As you can see, I chose 3 of my 4 d-men in the final rounds. Unless you're talking about Lidstrom or Niedermayer, I find it prudent to select blueliners at the end of the draft; why waste a mid-round pick on a 45 point getter when you could be taking a 70 point forward? Especially since there are typically a lot of 40 point d-men remaing in the end. As for my selections, I think Redden has the capacity to bag a 60+ point season as the #1 guy in Ottawa (thus my making an exception for him and taking him in round 5). I picked up Beauchemin because I believe (hope?) he'll get some significant PP time with Anaheim, even with Pronger in the mix. I picked up Campbell because he'll be spending time on the Sabres top PP unit and I chose Van Ryn because he's quietly scored 22 goals for Florida the last 2 seasons. Overall, if my defenders average about 40 points between them, I'll be happy.
Incredibly, Mark Bell lasted all the way to round 7, where I got him with the 80th selection. If he sticks on the Thornton-Cheechoo line I may just end up with the steal of the draft.
Marco Sturm was my next selection. A lot of people forgot about Sturm in the wake of Thornton's Art Ross season, but he did gather 29 goals playing on Boston's first line. This year, he'll be playing with one of Bergeron or Savard at center and should be a member of a first unit PP that will also include guys like Chara, Mara and/or Stuart. A 30+ goal season is not not out of the question for Marco.
Kovalev was the first Canadiens taken in the draft. I picked him 104th overall! He's a bit of risk, granted, thanks his penchant for getting injured and taking weeks off at a time. However, he should get top PP minutes in Montreal and does have the capacity to put together a 30-40 goal campaign (if everything goes right). I figured the risk was worth the reward this late in the proceedings.
I've been beating the drum for Kristian Huselius recently, so I plucked him with choice #113. He was Calgary's best player with the man-advantage last season and scored at a 60 point pace while wearing the Flaming C. Should Juice land on the first unit PP with Iggy and Tanguay there's no reason not to expect a career year out of him. In addition, I couldn't in good conscience be a Calgary fan and not select a single Flame.
Finally, I agonized and agonized over my DH pick. Everytime I thought of the "perfect guy" I managed to convince myself it was too obvious a choice and someone else was going to select him. Possibilites that occured to me included McAmmond, Ponikarovsky, Penner, Perry, Rucchin, Amonte, Brunette and Modin. In the end, I settled on Branko Radivojevic, thanks in part to some rumblings that he may be playing on the first line in Minnesota.
So that's it, the die is cast. I'm pretty pleased with my roster and have yet another reason to eagerly anticipate the start of the season.
PS - Special thanks go out to Chunkymoose for the incredible amount of work he put in to facilitating the draft and everything else this past week or so. Kudos!
This season's Five Hole Fanatics pool was set-up by Chunky Moose and Alex. The rules governing the draft and points were established as follows:
- Live draft format.
- Teams will consist of 10 forwards, 4 defensemen and 1 goalie. Goalies will be drafted seperately from skaters.
- 1 "darkhorse" selection per player. The DH will be submitted anonymously at the conclusion of the draft and cannot be a goalie. Any matching darkhorses are disqualified.
- Point System:
Skaters points -
- Goal: 2 points
- Assist: 1 point
- OT goal: +1 (bonus)
Goalie points -
- Goalie Win: 1 point
- Team Win: 1 point
- Shut-out: +2 points (bonus)
- Assist: 2 points
- Goal: 8 points
- Four trades allowed during the season. Only players on the "free agent" list are open for selection.
This was my first draft with a "darkhorse" choice and I've concluded that I like it. The challenge of choosing a decent player, while at the same time trying to avoid selecting the same guy as someone else, spices things up a little turns the end of the draft into something of a poker match.
(click to enlarge)Points of interest:
- Khabibulin was selected despite his terrible season last year AND the fact that 'tender's accrue points based on wins (both by them and by the team as a whole). Hmmm...does GM Krahn know something I don't?
- Iginla was the top Flame to be selected at #9 although Tanguay wasn't far behind at #18. Phaneuf was the first defensemen to be taken at #30. Altogether, 10 Calgary players were drafted - Iginla, Tanguay, Phaneuf, Lombardi, Huselius, Hamrlik, Regehr, A. Ference, Langkow and Kipper.
- Kiprusoff was snagged first in the goalie draft, of course. Ryan Miller was the surprise second choice, followed by Brodeur. I selected Vokoun with the 8th pick. The fact that Nashville will play the likes of Chicago, St. Louis and Columbus all year forced my hand.
- The average age of the oldest team selected: 34.31 (Thomsen).
- The team with the most Canadians: 12 of 16 (Tyler).
- Players that went undrafted: Modin, Brunette, JP Dumont, PM Bouchard, Bulis.
- On a "You can't make this kind of shit up" note - Alex Hemsky was the first Oiler selected at pick #44(!).
My team and Strategy:
Seeing as goals are worth double that of assists, I made sure to tab goal getters and top powerplay guys in my draft. Although I was stuck in the 8th position, I still managed to grab Kovalchuk as my first selection. My rationale? Kovalchuk's goal totals have been steadily increasing since he broke into the NHL (29, 38, 41 and 52) meaning he's in line for a pretty massive season. It also helps that he's deadly on the PP.
Another strategy I employed this year was "linking" linemates: by grabbing a decent offensive line, goals can often be worth 3 points (goal+assist) rather than just 2 (goal). Thus my Hossa pick - not only is he a first unit PP linemate of my first round selection, he's also a pretty damn consistent point-getter (he hasn't had less than 30 goals in the last 5 seasons). Should be a pretty lethal combination. Some other linked (potential) linemates on my team include Briere, Afinogenov and Kotalik. Basically, I wanted to get a healthy piece what I think will be a deadly Sabre PP.
As you can see, I chose 3 of my 4 d-men in the final rounds. Unless you're talking about Lidstrom or Niedermayer, I find it prudent to select blueliners at the end of the draft; why waste a mid-round pick on a 45 point getter when you could be taking a 70 point forward? Especially since there are typically a lot of 40 point d-men remaing in the end. As for my selections, I think Redden has the capacity to bag a 60+ point season as the #1 guy in Ottawa (thus my making an exception for him and taking him in round 5). I picked up Beauchemin because I believe (hope?) he'll get some significant PP time with Anaheim, even with Pronger in the mix. I picked up Campbell because he'll be spending time on the Sabres top PP unit and I chose Van Ryn because he's quietly scored 22 goals for Florida the last 2 seasons. Overall, if my defenders average about 40 points between them, I'll be happy.
Incredibly, Mark Bell lasted all the way to round 7, where I got him with the 80th selection. If he sticks on the Thornton-Cheechoo line I may just end up with the steal of the draft.
Marco Sturm was my next selection. A lot of people forgot about Sturm in the wake of Thornton's Art Ross season, but he did gather 29 goals playing on Boston's first line. This year, he'll be playing with one of Bergeron or Savard at center and should be a member of a first unit PP that will also include guys like Chara, Mara and/or Stuart. A 30+ goal season is not not out of the question for Marco.
Kovalev was the first Canadiens taken in the draft. I picked him 104th overall! He's a bit of risk, granted, thanks his penchant for getting injured and taking weeks off at a time. However, he should get top PP minutes in Montreal and does have the capacity to put together a 30-40 goal campaign (if everything goes right). I figured the risk was worth the reward this late in the proceedings.
I've been beating the drum for Kristian Huselius recently, so I plucked him with choice #113. He was Calgary's best player with the man-advantage last season and scored at a 60 point pace while wearing the Flaming C. Should Juice land on the first unit PP with Iggy and Tanguay there's no reason not to expect a career year out of him. In addition, I couldn't in good conscience be a Calgary fan and not select a single Flame.
Finally, I agonized and agonized over my DH pick. Everytime I thought of the "perfect guy" I managed to convince myself it was too obvious a choice and someone else was going to select him. Possibilites that occured to me included McAmmond, Ponikarovsky, Penner, Perry, Rucchin, Amonte, Brunette and Modin. In the end, I settled on Branko Radivojevic, thanks in part to some rumblings that he may be playing on the first line in Minnesota.
So that's it, the die is cast. I'm pretty pleased with my roster and have yet another reason to eagerly anticipate the start of the season.
PS - Special thanks go out to Chunkymoose for the incredible amount of work he put in to facilitating the draft and everything else this past week or so. Kudos!
Monday, September 11, 2006
Rookie Intrasquad Game Notes
I managed to catch most of the scrimmage between the hopefuls for the coming season last night. In many cases, it was my first live and up-close observation of the player in question (in other cases, it was the first time I'd even heard of the guy - Chris Neiszner?).
Initially, the experience was a little overwhelming - trying to diligently follow two full teams of nameless players during a game is akin to counting grains of sand while the tide's coming in. Thankfully, the Flames provided a sheet detailing each players team affiliation (Red or Black) and their jersey numbers. Unfortunately, trying to match number to player through the roster sheet while keeping on eye on play at all times proved to be a bit of challenge. Of course, as the game progressed, certain stand-outs became familiar to me, negating the need to glance at the RS every other time they touched the puck.
For those interested few that were unable to attend, follow the link to some brief youtube material provided by "Furnaceface" from the Calgarypuck.com messageboards:
Link.
(Thanks FF)
Also, the official Flames site has notes on the game here.
My Thoughts:
The Good
- The best goalie of the evening was Leland Irving. He was flawless during the third period, which included a very impressive cross-crease pad save on Eric Nystrom. All the other tenders I saw were roughly equal to each other.
- Justin Taylor (C) was surprisingly good, especially in the 2nd period. He seemed to have decent offensive instincts and made a couple of notable plays down low. Also scored Team Black's second goal.
- Andrei Taratukhin (C) was fairly decent, though he seemed to fade in the third period. He scored a snap-shot-through-the-legs goal in the second period and was an active participant in either end of the rink. He tended to get winded faster than the other players and took shorter shifts, though.
- Eric Nystrom (LW) was decent all around, but was especially effective along the boards. He probably should have scored on the 2on1 against Irving (mentioned above), but he was still clearly one of the better players there.
- Dustin Boyd (C) while being one of the smaller guys was also one of the faster ones. He seemed a little "manic" at times - quick and panicy - but he asserted himself well overall. He managed to make some nice moves breaking in against defensemen.
- Daniel Ryder (C) impressed me throroughly. One of the younger and, like Boyd, more diminuitive players, Ryder still managed to score a goal and was part of one of the best forward trios on the ice near the end of the game (Ryder, Germyn, Prust). He made smart, crisp passes and often seemed to be in the place at the right time. I can't wait to see him here again next year.
- Adam Cracknell (RW) scored with a laser beam to the top corner in the 3rd period, and generally seemed dangerous in the offensive zone most of the night. May be a late, late round steal should he do well in the AHL this season.
- Richie Regehr and Tim Ramholt (D) formed a pretty steady duo for Team Red. Ramholt managed to stand up two advancing forwards in sequence during one play. Regehr was just plain solid all over the ice.
- Mark Giordano (D) popped up here and there. I would go for long stretches without noticing him and then suddenly a d-man would make a great first pass or decent rub-out and I'd have to look up his number again.
- Brandon Prust (LW) was both fast and hungry. I think he had two assists on the night, the best one was a two-on-one feed to Carsen Germyn. Differentiated himself well from a lot of the other hopefuls I thought.
The Bad
- Kris Chucko (RW) was completely unremarkable. To the degree that I had to specifically look for his jersey number to ensure that we was, in fact, playing. I can't remember a single Chucko shift or even play.
- Matt Pelech (D) was similar to Chucko; didn't really stand out. The one time I really noticed him he was "unleashing" a puck at curling speed from the point. Will most assuredly be returning to Junior this year.
- Myles Rumsey (D) was clearly over his head. I doubt you will ever hear his name in the big league.
- John Armstrong (C) was pretty much invisible as well. He has a bunch of years ahead of him, however, so that's not a big concern.
- I expected to see to see more of last year's AHL guys Tomi Maki (LW) and Cam Cunning (LW), but neither of them made any kind of lasting mark.
The final score in the game was 4-2 in favor of Team Red. Cracknell, Germyn, Taratukhin and Ryder scored for the victors while Taylor and Van Der Gulik replied for Team Black.
For those of you that missed last night's tilt the re-match is set for tonight at the saddledome. If guys like Chucko and Pelech assert themselves with some kind of authority, Team Black might be able to avenge Sunday night's defeat...
Initially, the experience was a little overwhelming - trying to diligently follow two full teams of nameless players during a game is akin to counting grains of sand while the tide's coming in. Thankfully, the Flames provided a sheet detailing each players team affiliation (Red or Black) and their jersey numbers. Unfortunately, trying to match number to player through the roster sheet while keeping on eye on play at all times proved to be a bit of challenge. Of course, as the game progressed, certain stand-outs became familiar to me, negating the need to glance at the RS every other time they touched the puck.
For those interested few that were unable to attend, follow the link to some brief youtube material provided by "Furnaceface" from the Calgarypuck.com messageboards:
Link.
(Thanks FF)
Also, the official Flames site has notes on the game here.
My Thoughts:
The Good
- The best goalie of the evening was Leland Irving. He was flawless during the third period, which included a very impressive cross-crease pad save on Eric Nystrom. All the other tenders I saw were roughly equal to each other.
- Justin Taylor (C) was surprisingly good, especially in the 2nd period. He seemed to have decent offensive instincts and made a couple of notable plays down low. Also scored Team Black's second goal.
- Andrei Taratukhin (C) was fairly decent, though he seemed to fade in the third period. He scored a snap-shot-through-the-legs goal in the second period and was an active participant in either end of the rink. He tended to get winded faster than the other players and took shorter shifts, though.
- Eric Nystrom (LW) was decent all around, but was especially effective along the boards. He probably should have scored on the 2on1 against Irving (mentioned above), but he was still clearly one of the better players there.
- Dustin Boyd (C) while being one of the smaller guys was also one of the faster ones. He seemed a little "manic" at times - quick and panicy - but he asserted himself well overall. He managed to make some nice moves breaking in against defensemen.
- Daniel Ryder (C) impressed me throroughly. One of the younger and, like Boyd, more diminuitive players, Ryder still managed to score a goal and was part of one of the best forward trios on the ice near the end of the game (Ryder, Germyn, Prust). He made smart, crisp passes and often seemed to be in the place at the right time. I can't wait to see him here again next year.
- Adam Cracknell (RW) scored with a laser beam to the top corner in the 3rd period, and generally seemed dangerous in the offensive zone most of the night. May be a late, late round steal should he do well in the AHL this season.
- Richie Regehr and Tim Ramholt (D) formed a pretty steady duo for Team Red. Ramholt managed to stand up two advancing forwards in sequence during one play. Regehr was just plain solid all over the ice.
- Mark Giordano (D) popped up here and there. I would go for long stretches without noticing him and then suddenly a d-man would make a great first pass or decent rub-out and I'd have to look up his number again.
- Brandon Prust (LW) was both fast and hungry. I think he had two assists on the night, the best one was a two-on-one feed to Carsen Germyn. Differentiated himself well from a lot of the other hopefuls I thought.
The Bad
- Kris Chucko (RW) was completely unremarkable. To the degree that I had to specifically look for his jersey number to ensure that we was, in fact, playing. I can't remember a single Chucko shift or even play.
- Matt Pelech (D) was similar to Chucko; didn't really stand out. The one time I really noticed him he was "unleashing" a puck at curling speed from the point. Will most assuredly be returning to Junior this year.
- Myles Rumsey (D) was clearly over his head. I doubt you will ever hear his name in the big league.
- John Armstrong (C) was pretty much invisible as well. He has a bunch of years ahead of him, however, so that's not a big concern.
- I expected to see to see more of last year's AHL guys Tomi Maki (LW) and Cam Cunning (LW), but neither of them made any kind of lasting mark.
The final score in the game was 4-2 in favor of Team Red. Cracknell, Germyn, Taratukhin and Ryder scored for the victors while Taylor and Van Der Gulik replied for Team Black.
For those of you that missed last night's tilt the re-match is set for tonight at the saddledome. If guys like Chucko and Pelech assert themselves with some kind of authority, Team Black might be able to avenge Sunday night's defeat...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)